hDAF transgenic pig livers are protected from hyperacute rejection during ex vivo perfusion with human blood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine if human decay-accelerating factor (hDAF) protects against hyperacute rejection in an ex vivo liver perfusion system using human blood. Pig livers were perfused ex vivo via the portal vein for an average of 5-6 h using a membrane oxygenator. Three groups were studied. Group I: Wild-type pig livers were alloperfused with fresh pig blood (n = 5). Group II: Wild-type pig livers were xenoperfused with fresh human blood (n = 5). Group III: hDAF transgenic pig livers were xenoperfused with fresh human blood (n = 5). The graft ischemic time, ratio of perfusate volume to liver weight, flow rate, and perfusate hematocrit were similar in each group. The hDAF livers perfused with human blood (Group III) had a lower ALT level, less protein and albumin losses, lower bilirubin levels in the perfusate, less weight gain, and greater bile production than the wild-type livers perfused with human blood. Histology showed classic features of hyperacute rejection in Group II, including massive hemorrhage, severe vasculitits, fibrin and C5b-9 deposition, and endothelial damage within 1 h of perfusion, whereas liver histology studies in Groups I and III were near normal. IgG and IgM deposits were seen in the xenoperfused livers. Electron microscopy (EM) and immuno-EM showed loss of endothelial cells, trapping of white blood cells and platelets, and diffuse fibrin deposits in Group II only. hDAF pig livers perfused with human blood showed superior function and histology when compared with wild-type pig livers. These data suggest that (1) hyperacute rejection may contribute to the inconsistent results using wild-type pig livers for extracorporeal liver support and (2) genetically modified pigs that express hDAF may provide a better donor source than wild-type pigs for extracorporeal liver support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".