Evaluation of the Frequency and Intensity of Osmophobia Between Headache Attacks in Migraine Patients Through an Osmophobia Diary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Our objective was to determine the frequency and intensity of osmophobia between headache attacks in migraine patients through an osmophobia diary. Methods: Patients with migraine without aura or with episodic tension-type headache (ETTH), diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition (beta version) (ICHD-3β), were interviewed about osmophobia between headache attacks. Results: We studied 200 patients with migraine without aura and 200 with ETTH. Osmophobia between headache attacks was restricted to migraine patients (48/200, 24.0%). The osmophobia diary showed a frequency of osmophobia between attacks of 15.6 ± 6.8 days (95% CI: 13.7 - 17.7) in the 30-day evaluation period and in 62.5% (30/48) of migraine patients who presented this symptom, the frequency was greater than 15 days. The intensity ranged from severe to very severe in 61.5% (460/748) of all episodes of osmophobia. Osmophobia index was equal to 42.3 ± 17.93 (95% CI: 37.2 - 47.4). Conclusion: An osmophobia diary could be considered as a potentially valuable tool to be applied and tested in later studies to evaluate the frequency and intensity of osmophobia between headache attacks in migraine patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".