Surface modifications during femtosecond laser ablation in vacuum, air, and water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Femtosecond laser ablation technique has been used to process Si and Au targets in vacuum, air and water environment. The threshold of ablation was found to be much lower for Si compared to Au and that was related to much better radiation absorption of Si. The values of the threshold were almost identical for vacuum, air and water in the case of Si (0.4 J/cm<sup>2</sup> 0.2 J/cm<sup>2</sup> in the single and multi-pulse irradiation regime, respectively) and Au (0.9 J/cm<sup>2</sup> and 0.3 J/cm<sup>2</sup>). Craters on the surface of Si and Au were essentially similar for low fluences, suggesting an involvement of the same radiation-related mechanism of material removal, whereas for high fluences significant differences could take place. In particular, quite different crater morphologies were observed during the laser ablation in water, including ones with nanoporous layers for Si and ones with concentric spheres for Au. The differences of morphologies for high laser fluences were explained by the involvement of plasma-related effects under the processing in relatively dense media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".