MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975579513 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.206404

2D Electron Gas at Arbitrary Spin Polarizations and Coupling Strengths: Exchange-Correlation Energies, Distribution Functions, and Spin-Polarized Phases

2001· article· en· W1975579513 on OpenAlexaff
F. Perrot, M. W. C. Dharma‐wardana

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaBruyère
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSpin (aerodynamics)Fermi gasCoulombCondensed matter physicsCoupling constantDistribution functionQuantumHelmholtz free energyElectronQuantum fluidCoupling (piping)FerromagnetismQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use the classical mapping of quantum fluids [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 959 (2000)] for a study of the uniform 2D electron gas. The "quantum temperature" T(q) of the classical 2D Coulomb fluid having the same correlation energy E(c) as the quantum fluid is determined as a function of the density parameter r(s). Using this T(q), spin-dependent pair-distribution functions are determined, and an analytic fit to the E(c) is given. The T(q) for 2D and 3D electron fluids is found to be approximately the same universal function of the classical coupling constant Gamma. The coupling Gamma increases more rapidly with density in 2D; hence, we present a scheme for including bridge terms in the 2D hypernetted-chain method. The Helmholtz free energies of the spin-polarized and unpolarized phases are calculated, and the existence of a ferromagnetic phase near r(s) approximately 30 is found to be a marginal possibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207