MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975615303 · doi:10.1115/detc2007-34248

Structural Vibration Control of a Moving 3-PRR Flexible Parallel Manipulator With Multiple PZT Actuators and Sensors

2007· article· en· W1975615303 on OpenAlexaff
Xuping Zhang, James K. Mills, William L. Cleghorn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorLead zirconate titanateVibrationControl theory (sociology)Vibration controlController (irrigation)Active vibration controlStructural engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringAcousticsPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the control of structural vibrations of a 3-PRR parallel manipulator with three flexible intermediate links, bonded with multiple lead zirconate titanate (PZT) actuators and sensors. Flexible intermediate links are modeled as Euler-Bernoulli beams with pinned-pinned boundary conditions. A PZT actuator controller is designed based on strain rate feed control (SRF). Control moments from PZT actuators are transformed to force vectors in modal space, and are incorporated in the dynamic model of the manipulator. The dynamic equations are developed based on the assumed mode method for the flexible parallel manipulator with multiple PZT actuator and sensor patches. Numerical simulation is performed and the results indicate that the proposed active vibration control strategy is effective. Frequency spectra analyses of structural vibrations further illustrate that deformations from structural vibration of flexible links are suppressed to a significant extent when the proposed vibration control strategy is employed, while the deflections caused by inertial and coupling forces are not reduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207