MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975635304 · doi:10.1002/cne.10494

Developmental changes in the expression of growth hormone‐releasing hormone and pituitary adenylate cyclase‐activating polypeptide in zebrafish

2002· article· en· W1975635304 on OpenAlexaff
Sandra L. Krueckl, Erica A. Fradinger, Nancy M. Sherwood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyZebrafishInternal medicineEndocrinologyIn situ hybridizationBlastulaVasotocinGene expressionHormoneGrowth hormone–releasing hormoneNeuropeptideGeneCell biologyGastrulationEmbryogenesisEmbryoGeneticsGrowth hormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) are structurally and functionally related members of the glucagon superfamily, a group of hormones important in development, growth, and metabolism. Our objectives were to determine the developmental expression pattern of the ghrh-pacap1 gene using the zebrafish model. The temporal and spatial expression pattern of the ghrh-pacap1 gene was examined by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. In zebrafish, the ghrh-pacap1 mRNA transcript was expressed throughout development beginning at the transition between the blastula and gastrula periods. During midgastrulation, alternative splicing resulted in the generation of a novel transcript lacking the cryptic peptide. During the segmentation period, expression was localized to the neural tube, developing eye, and neural crest; strong expression was found in the developing cerebellum. Later in development, expression was localized in the hatching gland and developing pharyngeal arches. The temporal and spatial expression pattern of the ghrh-pacap1 transcript suggests that these hormones may modulate patterning during development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207