Investigation of the structure stability and superelastic behavior of thermomechanically treated Ti-Nb-Zr and Ti-Nb-Ta shape-memory alloys
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The superelastic parameters of Ti-Nb-Ta and Ti-Nb-Zr alloys, such as Young’s modulus, residual strain, and transformation yield stress after thermomechanical treatment (TMT), were determined during cyclic mechanical tests using the tension-unloading scheme (maximum strain 2% per cycle, ten cycles). The superelastic parameters and the alloy structure have been studied by electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis before and after testing and after holding for 40 days, as well as after retesting. The Young’s modulus of the Ti-Nb-Ta alloy decreases from 30–40 to 20–25 GPa during mechanocycling after TMT by different modes; however, it returns to its original magnitude during subsequent holding for 40 days, and changes only a little during repeated mechanocycling. The Young’s modulus of the Ti-Nb-Zr alloy changes insignificantly during mechanocycling, recovers during holding, and behaves stably upon repeated mechanocycling. Surface tensile stresses arise during mechanocycling, which facilitate the development of martensitic transformation under load, orient it, and thereby promote a decrease in the transformation yield stress and the residual strain. The enhancement of the level of initial strengthening stabilizes the superelastic behavior during mechanocycling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it