MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975658035 · doi:10.1080/01694243.2012.693830

Study on the role of polyethylenimine as gene delivery carrier using molecular dynamics simulations

2012· article· en· W1975658035 on OpenAlexafffund
Chongbo Sun, Tian Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsPolyethylenimineNucleic acidGene deliveryMolecular dynamicsMoleculePolymerNanotechnologyMaterials scienceDNACombinatorial chemistryBiophysicsChemistryGenetic enhancementComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryTransfectionGeneBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyethylenimine (PEI) is known to be one of the most promising polymers to serve as a delivery carrier in gene therapy. Complexation between PEI molecules and nucleic acids results in nanoparticles that can subsequently enter cells for therapeutic treatment. Design of the carrier molecules for stabler complexation, better cell uptake, and lower cytotoxicity remains to be a challenge. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations allow atomistic level examination of the complexation between PEI and nucleic acids, as well as the interaction of the complexes formed with other entities in the delivery path. It is a powerful tool in revealing the role of carrier molecules and guiding the design of more effective delivery systems. In this work, we first review the current status in studying complexation of PEI with nucleic acids and interaction between the complex formed and cell membrane. We have conducted preliminary MD simulations on several aspects of complexation between PEI and DNA. These results are presented to demonstrate how MD simulations can help understand the role of PEI in serving as a gene delivery carrier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Adhesion Science and TechnologySame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207