MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975658327 · doi:10.1109/ds-rt.2010.16

MOSAIC - A Mobile Peer-to-Peer Networks-Based 3D Streaming Supplying Partner Protocol

2010· article· en· W1975658327 on OpenAlexaff
Haifa Raja Maamar, Azzedine Boukerche, Emil M. Petriu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile deviceMobile computingComputer networkWireless networkBandwidth (computing)Mobile WebMobile telephonyWirelessMobile technologyMobile radioTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid spread of wireless mobile devices and the advances of wireless communication have fueled the interest about streaming 3D graphics on mobile devices to be used in augmented reality based classes of applications. In these types of applications, a real world is mapped into the virtual world and thin mobile devices are employed to navigate in the virtual simulated environment (VE). In evidence, one of the prime difficulties in 3D streaming over thin mobile devices consists of the limited mobile resources and capabilities, i.e., low processing power, limited storage capacity, limited graphics' hardware and graphics' accelerator making it very difficult for mobile devices to render and process large and complex 3D scenes. So far, a significant body of work has been dedicated to the challenges of mobile networks-based 3D streaming such as streaming performance, and bandwidth limitation. On the downside, very few studies have been committed to the mobile supplying partner strategies aiming at determining the peer that owns the correct information and that possesses enough bandwidth to send the required data quickly and efficiently to other peers in need. In this paper, we propose MOSAIC, our supplying partner strategy protocol for mobile networks-based 3D streaming. MOSAIC is based on the quick discovery of multiple supplying partners, by optimizing the time required by peers to acquire data, avoiding unnecessary messages propagation and network congestion, and decreasing the network bandwidth over utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Remote Desktop TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207