Modulation of HIV transcription by CD8+ cells is mediated via multiple elements of the long terminal repeat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HIV replication and LTR-mediated gene expression can be modulated by CD8(+) cells in a cell type-dependent manner. We have previously shown that supernatant fluids of activated CD8(+) cells of HIV-infected individuals suppress long terminal repeat (LTR)-mediated transcription of HIV in T cells while enhancing transcription in monocytic cells. Here, we have examined the effect of culture of T cells and monocytic cells with CD8(+) supernatant fluids, and subsequent binding of transcription factors to the HIV-1 LTR. In transfections using constructs in which NF kappa B or NFAT-1 sites were mutated, the LTR retained the ability to respond positively to culture with CD8 supernatant fluid in monocytic cells. Nuclear extracts prepared from both Jurkat T cells and U38 monocytic cells cultured with CD8(+) cell supernatant fluid demonstrated increased binding to the HIV-1 LTR at an AP-1 site which overlapped the chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter (COUP) site. In monocytic cells, increased binding activity was observed at the NF kappa B sites of the LTR. In contrast, an inhibition in binding at the NF kappa B sites was observed in Jurkat cells. Examination of two NFAT-1 sites revealed enhanced binding at - 260 to - 275 bp in U38 cells which was reduced by cellular activation. PMA and ionomycin-induced binding at a second NFAT-1 site (- 205 to - 216 bp) was abrogated by CD8(+) cell supernatant fluid in T cells. These results, taken together, suggest that factors present in CD8(+) supernatant fluids may act through several sites of the LTR to modulate transcription in a cell type-dependent manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".