MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1975745420 · doi:10.1086/323357

<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Imagery and Canada‐France‐Hawaii Telescope Fabry‐Perot Two‐dimensional Spectroscopy in Hα of the Ejected Nebula M1‐67: Turbulent Status

2001· article· en· W1975745420 on OpenAlexaffabout
Y. Grosdidier, A. F. J. Moffat, Sébastien Blais-Ouellette, Gilles Joncas, A. Acker

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCanada Council for the ArtsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsNebulaAstronomyStarsPlanetary nebulaProper motionGalaxyEmission nebulaContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bright circumstellar nebulae around massive stars are potentially useful to derive time-dependent mass-loss rates and hence constrain the evolution of the central stars. A key case in this context is the relatively young ejection-type nebula M1-67 around the runaway Population I Wolf-Rayet star WR 124 (=209 BAC), which exhibits a WN 8 spectrum. With HST -WFPC2 we have obtained a deep, Hα image of M1-67. This image shows a wealth of complex detail that was briefly presented previously by Grosdidier et al. With the interferometer of the Université Laval (Québec, Canada), we have obtained complementary Fabry-Perot Hα data using Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) MOS/SIS. From these data M1-67 appears more or less as a spherical (or elliptical, with the major axis along the line of sight), thick, shell seen almost exactly along its direction of rapid spatial motion away from the observer in the ISM. However, a simple thick shell by itself would not explain the observed multiple radial velocities along the line of sight. This velocity dispersion leads one to consider M1-67 as a thick accelerating shell. Given the extreme perturbations of the velocity field in M1-67, it is virtually impossible to measure any systematic impact of the present WR (or previous LBV) wind on the nebular structure. The irregular nature of the velocity field is likely due to either large variations in the density distribution of the ambient ISM or large variations in the central star mass-loss history. In addition, either from the density field or the velocity field, we find no clear evidence for a bipolar outflow, as was claimed in other studies. On the deep Hα image we have performed continuous wavelet transforms to isolate stochastic structures of different characteristic size and look for scaling laws. Small-scale wavelet coefficients show that the density field of M1-67 is remarkably structured in chaotically (or possibly radially) oriented filaments everywhere in the nebula. We draw attention to a short, marginally inertial range at the smallest scales (6.7-15.0 × 10 -3 pc), which can be attributed to turbulence in the nebula, and a strong scale break at larger scales. Examination of the structure functions for different orders shows that the turbulent regime may be intermittent. Using our Fabry-Perot interferograms, we also present an investigation of the statistical properties of fluctuating gas motions using structure functions traced by Hα emission-line centroid velocities. We find that there is a clear correlation at scales 0.02-0.22 pc between the mean quadratic differences of radial velocities and distance over the surface of the nebula. This implies that the velocity field shows an inertial range likely related to turbulence, though not coincident with the small inertial range detected from the density field. The first- and second-order moments of the velocity increments are found to scale as ⟨|Δ v ( r )|⟩ ~ r 0.5 and ⟨|Δ v ( r )| 2 ⟩ ~ r 0.9 . The former scaling law strongly suggests that supersonic, compressible turbulence is at play in the nebula; on the other hand, the latter scaling law agrees very well with Larson-type laws for velocity turbulence. Examination of the structure functions for different orders shows that the turbulent regime is slightly intermittent and highly multifractal with universal multifractal indexes α ≈ 1.90-1.92 and C 1 ≈ 0.04 ± 0.01.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→