Characterization of L-lysine transport across equine and porcine jejunal and colonic brush border membrane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In nonruminant herbivores, microbially derived AA could contribute to whole-body AA homeostasis and thus decrease predicted AA requirements. However, postileal capacity of AA uptake is currently unknown. Therefore, to test the hypothesis that Lys is transported across the large colon mucosal apical membrane with capacity similar to that of the small intestinal mucosa in the pony and pig, we examined Lys transport in vitro using brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV). Mucosa was collected from the distal jejunum (DJ) and proximal large colon (PLC) of growing pigs (n = 3) and ponies (n = 4), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. Jejunal and colonic BBMV were manufactured by Mg(2+) precipitation and used to determine initial rates and kinetics [the maximal transport rate (V(max)) and the Michaelis constant (K(M))] of l-Lys transport into apical epithelia by rapid filtration technique in Na(+)-gradient incubation buffer. Initial rates of total l-Lys uptake did not differ between the PLC and DJ in either the pig or the pony, or between the pony and the pig, at each l-Lys concentration. In the pig, compared with the DJ, l-Lys transport V(max) in the PLC did not differ (121 ± 26 and 180 ± 26 pmol•mg of protein(-1)•s(-1), respectively; P = 0.14) and l-Lys K(M) in the PLC tended to be greater (0.23 ± 0.22 and 0.89 ± 0.22 mM, respectively; P = 0.09). In the pony, compared with the DJ, l-Lys transport V(max) in the PLC was greater (62 ± 25 and 149 ± 25 pmol•mg of protein(-1)•s(-1), respectively; P = 0.04) and l-Lys K(M) in the PLC was greater (0.08 ± 0.22 and 1.05 ± 0.22 mM, respectively; P = 0.02). l-Lysine diffusion was not different between segments; however, total intestinal diffusion was greater (P = 0.03) in the pony than in the pig (115 ± 10 and 73 ± 10 pmol·mg of protein(-1)•s(-1), respectively). These results demonstrate that the large colon is capable of l-Lys transport across the apical epithelial membrane with greater capacity and less affinity than the jejunum, indicating that the large colon may play a significant role in l-Lys absorption and homeostasis in hindgut fermenters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".