MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975771680 · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4210

Characterization of L-lysine transport across equine and porcine jejunal and colonic brush border membrane

2011· article· en· W1975771680 on OpenAlexaff
Adrienne Woodward, Ming Fan, Raymond J. Geor, L. Jill McCutcheon, N.P. Taylor, N. L. Trottier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPonyBrush borderJejunumIntestinal mucosaIncubationVesicleIleumChemistryBiologyMembrane transportBiochemistryMembraneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In nonruminant herbivores, microbially derived AA could contribute to whole-body AA homeostasis and thus decrease predicted AA requirements. However, postileal capacity of AA uptake is currently unknown. Therefore, to test the hypothesis that Lys is transported across the large colon mucosal apical membrane with capacity similar to that of the small intestinal mucosa in the pony and pig, we examined Lys transport in vitro using brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV). Mucosa was collected from the distal jejunum (DJ) and proximal large colon (PLC) of growing pigs (n = 3) and ponies (n = 4), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. Jejunal and colonic BBMV were manufactured by Mg(2+) precipitation and used to determine initial rates and kinetics [the maximal transport rate (V(max)) and the Michaelis constant (K(M))] of l-Lys transport into apical epithelia by rapid filtration technique in Na(+)-gradient incubation buffer. Initial rates of total l-Lys uptake did not differ between the PLC and DJ in either the pig or the pony, or between the pony and the pig, at each l-Lys concentration. In the pig, compared with the DJ, l-Lys transport V(max) in the PLC did not differ (121 ± 26 and 180 ± 26 pmol•mg of protein(-1)•s(-1), respectively; P = 0.14) and l-Lys K(M) in the PLC tended to be greater (0.23 ± 0.22 and 0.89 ± 0.22 mM, respectively; P = 0.09). In the pony, compared with the DJ, l-Lys transport V(max) in the PLC was greater (62 ± 25 and 149 ± 25 pmol•mg of protein(-1)•s(-1), respectively; P = 0.04) and l-Lys K(M) in the PLC was greater (0.08 ± 0.22 and 1.05 ± 0.22 mM, respectively; P = 0.02). l-Lysine diffusion was not different between segments; however, total intestinal diffusion was greater (P = 0.03) in the pony than in the pig (115 ± 10 and 73 ± 10 pmol·mg of protein(-1)•s(-1), respectively). These results demonstrate that the large colon is capable of l-Lys transport across the apical epithelial membrane with greater capacity and less affinity than the jejunum, indicating that the large colon may play a significant role in l-Lys absorption and homeostasis in hindgut fermenters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207