Detection and clinical significance of human acute myeloid leukaemia progenitors capable of long‐term proliferation <i>in vitro</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) blasts within individual patients are heterogeneous in their surface antigen expression and proliferative ability suggesting that, subsequent to transformation, differentiation occurs creating a hierarchy of progenitors in AML. Cells that can produce AML colonies (colony forming units, CFU) in growth factor containing suspension cultures (SC) over 4-8 weeks have a phenotype similar to AML progenitors that engraft non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice, but different from bulk AML blasts, suggesting that these AML SC-initiating cells (SC-IC) may be early progenitors. In this study, we evaluated culture conditions that provide for optimal growth of AML progenitors capable of long-term proliferation. The frequency of CFU, both initially and after 2-4 weeks of SC, varied over four logs between individual patients and was not related to French-American-British subtype. Using limiting dilution, the proliferative potential of individual SC-IC varied from 1 to 480 CFU. The frequency of CFU from SC after > 4 weeks was prognostic for patient survival, and correlated with NOD/SCID engrafting ability. These results suggest the use of long-term culture as an assay for AML cells with leukaemia sustaining potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".