Seismic imaging and anisotropy analysis of 9C 3D‐VSP data at Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2003Seismic imaging and anisotropy analysis of 9C 3D‐VSP data at Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan, CanadaAuthors: Gilles BellefleurLudmila AdamDon WhiteBruce MattocksTom DavisGilles BellefleurGeological Survey of Canada, Ludmila AdamColorado School of Mines, Don WhiteGeological Survey of Canada, Bruce MattocksPetroleum Geo‐Services, and Tom DavisColorado School of Mineshttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817531 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817531FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByA review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches8 July 2019 | Petroleum Science, Vol. 16, No. 5Anisotropic elastic moduli of carbonates and evaporites from the Weyburn-Midale reservoir and seal rocks14 February 2013 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 61, No. 2Fracture mapping using seismic amplitude variation with offset and azimuth analysis at the Weyburn CO2 storage siteGEOPHYSICS, Vol. 77, No. 63D, 9C seismic modeling and inversion of Weyburn Field dataGEOPHYSICS, Vol. 77, No. 4Detection of multiple fracture sets using observations of shear-wave splitting in microseismic data14 February 2011 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 59, No. 4Modeling sensitivity of 3D, 9-C wide azimuth data to changes in fluid content and crack density in cracked reservoirsGEOPHYSICS, Vol. 75, No. 5 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2003ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2003 Pages: 2452 publication data© 2003 Copyright © 2003 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Gilles Bellefleur, Ludmila Adam, Don White, Bruce Mattocks, and Tom Davis, (2003), "Seismic imaging and anisotropy analysis of 9C 3D‐VSP data at Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan, Canada," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1326-1329. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817531 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".