Abstract 3354: Investigating the role of Nodal in the regulation of integrin α6β4high trophoblast progenitor cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The human placenta is a highly invasive organ that invades the pregnant uterus to nourish the fetus. It develops from highly proliferative and phenotypically plastic cells called trophoblasts. Bi-potential trophoblast stem cells in the chorionic villi differentiate into the villous pathway to form the syncytiotrophoblast layer and the extravillous trophoblast (EVT). The HTR-8/SVneo cell line is widely used to study trophoblast biology. These cells simultaneously express villous-specific genes such as hCG and EVT-specific genes such as VE-Cadherin. Such phenotypic plasticity is indicative of a bi-potential cytotrophoblast progenitor. Preliminary work has shown that similar to the progenitors in situ, a subpopulation of HTR-8/SVneo cells expresses α6β4 integrin. This cell line also expresses Nodal, a stem cell-associated factor that sustains the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells and is re-expressed in certain cancers. We hypothesize that an α6β4high subset within HTR-8/SVneo cell line is enriched with bi-potential progenitors and that the stem cell-like properties of this population is maintained by Nodal signaling. Immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry were used to confirm the presence of an α6β4high subpopulation in the HTR-8/SVneo cell line. Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) was used to purify α6β4high and α6β4low populations from the heterogeneous HTR-8/SVneo cells. The ability of α6β4high, α6β4low and heterogeneous (unsorted) HTR-8/SVneo populations to undergo self-renewal was determined using a limiting dilution clonogenic assay. Differentiation into endovascular-like trophoblast was assessed using a tube-formation assay on Matrigel and invasion assays, and differentiation into villous trophoblast was assessed by measuring α-hCG. The expression of Nodal in the α6β4 subtypes was assayed using Western blotting. We determined that approximately 25% of HTR-8/SVneo cells express α6β4 integrin protein on their cell surface. The α6β4high subpopulation had a significantly higher self-renewal capacity than the heterogeneous HTR-8/SVneo population and the α6β4low subpopulation had a lower clonogenic capacity relative to the α6β4high and heterogeneous cells. Nearly 100% of the α6β4high cells formed tubes when plated on Matrigel. In contrast, the unsorted HTR-8/SVneo cells formed tubes much less efficiently, and the α6β4low population was unable to undergo tube formation. The α6β4high population was also more invasive than the α6β4low cells, and Nodal was expressed to a greater level in the α6β4high population. Conclusions: Our results suggest that α6β4high sub-population in the HTR-8SV/neo cell line may represent a villous cytotrophoblast stem cell and that this subpopulation is enriched with Nodal. By understanding the mechanisms by which this subpopulation is regulated, we may glean insight into the regulation of invasive cancer stem cell populations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3354. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3354
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".