MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1975964301 · doi:10.1139/e04-103

<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr of brines from the Fennoscandian Shield: a synthesis of groundwater isotopic data from the Baltic Sea region

2005· article· en· W1975964301 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Philippe Négrel, Joël Casanova, R. Blomqvist

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdEuropean Commission
KeywordsGroundwaterGeologyStrontiumIsotopes of strontiumSeawaterGeochemistryShieldSalinitySurface waterBaltic seaBaltic ShieldIsotopic signatureOceanographyPrecipitationAquiferIsotopeCrustPaleontologyEnvironmental scienceChemistryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High salinity Ca–Na–Cl brines occur in Sweden and Finland. The complex geological history of the Fennoscandian Shield is reflected by the wide range of saline waters whose chemical compositions have been explained by local water–rock interaction, simple evolution of relict sea water, or freezing of sea water during glacial periods. This study deals with the present knowledge of Sr isotopes in groundwater from the Fennoscandian Shield to better constrain the origin of their deep saline component. Two different mixing trends are seen between Äspö Island groundwater and the Baltic Sea. The first trend links the North Sea to rivers through various dilution levels in the Baltic; the second trend is a simple linear relationship through Äspö groundwaters, agreeing with a binary mixing between a Baltic end-member and a highly Sr-concentrated fluid. Strontium isotope compositions are presented for precipitation in Finland and Sweden, the Baltic Sea, and the river waters draining the Fennoscandian Shield, and for groundwaters from several sites in the Fennoscandian Shield. At least six mixing lines between rain-and-snow input and surface waters can be drawn in each region around the Baltic Sea, reflecting a first step of water–rock interaction. A second series of calculated lines links the surface end-members and the deep brines, and defines a range of 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios for the deep brines at each site. All sites show a specific 87 Sr/ 86 Sr signature and the large 87 Sr/ 86 Sr variations is site specific. The well-constrained 87 Sr/ 86 Sr signatures in deep brines should correspond to a large, well-mixed, and homogeneous water reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207