MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976008162 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v3i1.223

Improved Early Prediction of Preterm Pre-Eclampsia by Combining Second Trimester Maternal Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein and Uterine Artery Doppler

2014· article· en· W1976008162 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebecca Allen, Shemoon Marleen, Luxmilar Velauthar, Kevin Harrington, Joseph Aquilina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePreeclampsiaObstetricsEclampsiaUterine arteryReceiver operating characteristicGynecologyPregnancyGestationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. One of the primary aims of antenatal care is to identify women at high risk and provide them with prophylactic treatment and more intensive surveillance. Current identification is based mainly on maternal characteristics, which is not specific and sensitive enough to be an ideal screening test highlighting the need for an alternative. We evaluated the combination of second trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) and uterine artery Doppler (UAD) studies for the prediction of PE. Methods: A total of 724 women had MSAFP and UAD measured. The presence of notches and Resistance Index were measured. ROC ’ s were created for MSAFP and UAD alone and in combination. Sensitivities for the two outcomes were compared for a fixed specificity of 94% for PE and 97% for preterm PE. Results: A total of 41 women (5.7%) developed PE. The sensitivity of using UAD (bilateral notches/mean RI ≥ 0.735) was 60.9% and for MSAFP was 24.4% ( ≥ 2.0 MoM). The combination of UAD (bilateral notches/mean RI ≥ 0.55) and MSAFP ( ≥ 1.2 MoM), didn ’ t improve the sensitivity of UAD for PE for the same specificity; 17 women (2.4%) developed preterm PE. The sensitivity using UAD (bilateral notches/mean RI ≥ 0.75) was 29.4% and for MSAFP ( ≥ 2.6 MoM) was 5.9%. The combination of UAD (bilateral notches/mean RI ≥ 0.55) and MSAFP ( ≥ 1.6 MoM), improved the sensitivity for preterm preeclampsia to 64.7% (OR 52.17 (CI 17.81 - 152.84)). The improvement in sensitivity for the combined method was statistically significant compared to MSAFP (P < 0.01) or UAD (P < 0.02) alone. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2014;3(1):22-29 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo223w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207