Characterization of <i>BMP</i>2 gene expression in embryonic and adult Inner Mongolia Cashmere goat (<i>Capra hircus</i>) hair follicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mammalian skin consists of thousands of hair follicles, each undergoing continuous regenerative cycling including anagen, catagen and telogen. Hair follicle morphogenesis results in the appearance of fur in animals. Increasing evidence suggests that bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) play an important role in the induction and progression to various stages of the hair follicle cycle. In this study, BMP2 mRNA expression level was investigated from different phases using real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and localized with in situ hybridization in adult Inner Mongolia Cashmere goat. qRT-PCR revealed that the expression of BMP2 in early anagen was 27.8 times greater than expression during late anagen phase. The in situ hybridization detected BMP2 expressed at days 75 and 115 in both primary and secondary hair follicles during the embryonic period. Further, BMP 2 was expressed in primary hair follicles in late telogen and in secondary hair follicles in early anagen in adult goat. However, it was found to be absent in both primary and secondary hair follicle in late anagen in the adult goat. BMP2 expression was found to be higher in late telogen and early anagen phases and lower in late anagen in the goat’s skin and hair follicle, suggesting that it may have a role in the regeneration of hair follicle.Key words: BMP2, expression, Cashmere goat, hair follicle, in situ hybridization, real-time PCR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".