MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976022455 · doi:10.1364/josab.22.002480

Ultrafast tuning of two-dimensional planar photonic-crystal waveguides via free-carrier injection and the optical Kerr effect

2005· article· en· W1976022455 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica P. Mondia, Hong Tan, Stefan Lindén, H. M. van Driel, Jeff F. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFemtosecondBlueshiftUltrashort pulseOpticsOptoelectronicsBand gapKerr effectWaveguidePhotonic crystalFluenceExcitationRefractive indexPhotoluminescenceLaserPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Femtosecond pump–probe reflectivity and second-harmonic spectroscopy experiments are used to investigate the optical tuning of leaky modes in a two-dimensional GaAs photonic-crystal waveguide. For above bandgap excitation with 270 fs, 800 nm pulses with a pump fluence of 100 μJ cm−2, a blueshift of 16±2 nm is measured for a 1900 nm leaky mode, as observed from the shift of the resonantly enhanced second-harmonic pulse. Theoretical calculations of carrier-induced changes in the refractive index from band filling, bandgap shrinkage, and Drude contributions are in good agreement with the results. Recovery occurs within 2 ps and is attributed to recombination via deep-centered defects. For below bandgap excitation with 166 fs, 1900 nm pulses with a fluence of 800 μJ cm−2, redshifts ≥1.5 nm of the 1360 nm leaky mode are induced via the optical Kerr effect during the early part of the pump pulse, but thereafter the mode is blueshifted, owing likely to free carriers injected into or from deep-centered defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207