MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976044692 · doi:10.1002/mrm.21468

Sodium imaging optimization under specific absorption rate constraint

2008· article· en· W1976044692 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert Stobbe, Christian Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsFlip angleSpecific absorption rateRelaxation (psychology)Pulse (music)Nuclear magnetic resonanceAbsorption (acoustics)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)PhysicsRadio frequencySIGNAL (programming language)Magnetic resonance imagingOpticsMaterials scienceChemistryComputer scienceTelecommunicationsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of sodium imaging RF pulse parameter optimization for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) under specific absorption rate (SAR) constraints is introduced. This optimization concept is unique to sodium imaging, as sodium exhibits ultrarapid T(2) relaxation in vivo, and involves minimizing echo time (TE). For 3D radial k-space acquisition, minimizing TE (and T(2) loss) requires minimizing the RF pulse length. SNR optimization also involves exploiting rapid T(1) relaxation with shortened repetition time (TR) values. However, especially at higher fields, both RF pulse length and TR are constrained by SAR, which is also dependent on the flip angle. Quantum mechanical simulations were performed for SAR equivalent sets of RF pulse length, TR, and flip angle. It was determined that an SNR advantage is associated with a spoiled steady-state approach to sodium imaging with radial acquisition even though significantly longer RF pulses (and TE) are required to implement this approach under the SAR constraint at 4.7T. This advantage, compared to RF pulse sequences implementing ultrashort echo times, 90 degrees flip angles, and longer repetition times, was confirmed in healthy volunteers (measured SNR increase of approximately 38%) and used to produce excellent quality sodium images of the human brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207