MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976083510 · doi:10.1117/12.689312

Frequency chirped differential absorption LIDAR

2006· article· en· W1976083510 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Lytkine, Wolfgang Jäger, J. Tulip

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaserMaterials scienceAbsorption (acoustics)OpticsAbsorption spectroscopyChirpTunable diode laser absorption spectroscopySpectroscopyTrace gasUltrafast laser spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel concept design of a differential absorption LIDAR for open path trace gas sensing in the atmosphere. To perform a range-resolved gas sensing we propose to arrange a set of retroreflectors in the laser beam path to measure a differential absorption in adjacent sections. In validation experiments we used a pulsed DFB quantum cascade laser fabricated by Alpes Lasers. The laser was excited with 200-ns current pulses with a repetition rate of 10 kHz. The frequency chirp rate was found to increase from 7.7 to 1.0 cm-1/μs as peak injection current was increased from 7.1, to 7.8 A. We utilized the frequency chirp at laser substrate temperature of 24.0 °C to scan the 967.0 - 968.5 cm-1 spectral interval containing the absorption lines of CO2 and NH3. We detected ~ 0.25 ppmv of NH3 in nitrogen at atmospheric pressure using a double-pass gas cell with an effective absorption path of 2.4 m. Digital filtering of the spectra was shown to be effective in eliminating a high-frequency noise. To demonstrate range-resolved capabilities of the sensor we used two retroreflectors inserted into the laser beam. A differential absorption of CO2 at 967.7 cm-1 was measured with the gas cell placed in one of the sections. Our experiments indicate that the frequency chirped LIDAR can be used for open path spectroscopy of NH3 over the ranges up to ~ 1 km with a spatial resolution of ~ 30 m and detection limit of ~ 20 ppbv per a 30-m section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207