MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976093201 · doi:10.1122/1.1428319

Cone angle effects, radial pressure profile, and second normal stress difference for shear-thickening wormlike micelles

2002· article· en· W1976093201 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J.-Y. Lee, Jules J. Magda, Hsou Mei Hu, Ronald G. Larson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rheology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilatantRheometerRheologyRheometryShear rateMaterials scienceApparent viscosityShear (geology)ViscosityThermodynamicsShear modulusChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many dilute surfactant solutions containing long, thin, wormlike micelles undergo a shear-thickening transition at which the apparent viscosity jumps to a much higher value due to the formation of shear-induced structures. However, the behavior of the normal-stress differences N1 and N2 has not been studied at the low-shear rates and shear stresses (<0.1 Pa) at which shear thickening occurs in most of the commonly studied systems, such as aqueous solutions of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium salicylate (NaSS). For dilute equimolar solutions of CTAB/NaSS, the validity of measurements of the shear flow properties η, N1 and N2 via cone-and-plate rheometry is assessed by systematically varying the cone angle, and by measuring the pressure profile during cone-and-plate flows. The dependence on the cone angle of the apparent viscosity value is consistent with a stratified fluid structure, as shown to occur in Couette rheometers by Hu and co-workers [Hu, Y. T. et al., J. Rheol. 42, 1209–1226 (1998)]. However, N1 and N2 values show no obvious dependence on cone angle, and the occurrence of flow stratification is surprisingly difficult to detect from the pressure profile. As the shear rate is increased, the measured pressure profiles are suggestive of a gradual transition from viscometric to nonviscometric flow. By combining the results presented here with earlier results by Huang and co-workers [Huang, C.-M. et al., in Proceedings of the XII International Conference on Rheology, edited by A. Ait-Kadi et al. (Canadian Rheology Group, Quebec City, 1996)], we conclude that the same wormy micelle solution exhibits at least two flow transitions that might be described as “shear thickening.” In the shear-rate range of viscometric cone-and-plate flows, the measured normal-stress ratio −N2/N1 for dilute solutions of CTAB/NaSS wormy micelles is similar to the value observed for moderately entangled solutions of synthetic polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of RheologySame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207