MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976120640 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.fbcr13-a45

Abstract A45: Investigating the role of ASCL1 in regulating differentiation of gliobastoma precursor cells

2013· article· en· W1976120640 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole I. Park, Peter B. Dirks

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNeurogenesisPhenotypeCellular differentiationLineage markersWnt signaling pathwayCancer researchPrecursor cellDKK1Cell biologyPathologyCellGeneticsSignal transductionGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and lethal adult primary brain tumour, exhibits cellular heterogeneity and a subpopulation of tumour cells exhibits the neural precursor phenotype and drives tumourigenesis. These findings suggest that tumours may represent aberrant organogenesis with growth caused by unlimited proliferation and failure of differentiation of malignant precursor cells. It has yet to be determined the relative importance of aberrant self-renewal versus blocked differentiation in the brain tumour phenotype. As GBM-initiating cells have precursor cell properties, promotion of differentiation represents a potential strategy for treatment. Forcing glioblastoma precursor cells (GPCs) to differentiate terminally would limit clonal expansion and attenuate tumour growth. Data generated in our lab suggests that differentiation potential varies between different patient-derived GPC cultures. This study aims to determine what defines a blocked differentiation phenotype in human glioblastoma and to determine whether differentiation therapy is a feasible strategy for glioblastoma treatment. A key regulator of neuronal differentiation is ASCL1 during normal development and adult neurogenesis. Microarray analysis of ASCL1 expression in GPCs (n = 33) revealed two subgroups of GPCs as having either high or low expression. Preliminary evidence suggests that GPCs with high expression of ASCL1 exhibit neuronal lineage commitment whereas GPCs with low expression of ASCL1 do not undergo lineage commitment. This was confirmed using immunocytochemistry, quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analysis. Furthermore, an inverse correlation was observed between transcript levels of ASCL1 and DKK1, an antagonist of the Wnt signalling pathway, while a direct correlation was observed between ASCL1 and activated β-catenin (ABC). Treatment of GPCs with a GSK3β inhibitor resulted in the activation of Wnt signalling and concomitant increase in transcript levels of ASCL1 and neuronal lineage markers (i.e. TUJ1, MAP2). This study aims to further investigate the role of ASCL1 in glioblastoma and to determine whether neuronal lineage commitment in the context of ASCL1 activity is mediated in a Wnt-dependent manner. Gain- and loss-of-function studies are in progress to determine whether ASCL1 is sufficient and/or necessary for neuronal lineage commitment and consequent effects on tumour-initiating properties (i.e. proliferation and self-renewal) will be examined in vitro and in vivo. Citation Format: Nicole I. Park, Peter B. Dirks. Investigating the role of ASCL1 in regulating differentiation of gliobastoma precursor cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Third AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research; Sep 18-22, 2013; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(19 Suppl):Abstract nr A45.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→