Method for Simultaneous Epicardial and Endocardial Mapping of In Vivo Canine Heart: Application to Atrial Conduction Properties and Arrhythmia Mechanisms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that the three-dimensional structure of the atria may be crucial in arrhythmogenesis; however, previous in vivo atrial activation mapping studies have been limited to either endocardial or epicardial approaches. METHODS AND RESULTS: To investigate the role of endocardial and epicardial structures and their interaction in atrial conduction and arrhythmias, we used five epicardial plaques and two intra-atrial balloon arrays to record a total of 368 unipolar electrograms from the entire epicardial and endocardial surface of both atria. During regular 1:1 pacing from the right atrial appendage, right atrial endocardial activation spread considerably faster than epicardial (total activation time 45+/-12 msec vs 60+/-19 msec, respectively [mean +/- SD]; P < 0.05), pointing to preferential conduction over structures like the crista terminalis and pectinate muscles. No such differences were noted in the left atrium. Transseptal spread occurred via discrete anterior and posterior pathways, causing separate breakthroughs in anterior and posterior atrial regions, respectively. Dissociation between septal pathways played a role in reentry during vagal atrial fibrillation. In 2 of 4 dogs with atrial fibrillation associated with congestive heart failure, single macroreentrant circuits involving endocardial and epicardial components were revealed during the arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: We conclude that activation mapping using simultaneous recording from both epicardial and endocardial surfaces provides potentially important insights into the mechanisms of atrial conduction and arrhythmogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it