MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976141728 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2010.2040245

Photocurrent Modeling and Detectivity Optimization in a Resonant-Tunneling Quantum-Dot Infrared Photodetector

2010· article· en· W1976141728 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResponsivityPhysicsPhotocurrentQuantum dotDark currentPhotodetectorQuantum tunnellingCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical modeling of the photocurrent and detectivity optimization of a resonant-tunneling quantum-dot infrared photodetector (RT-QDIP) based on nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) is presented. The interaction with light used in the model is based on the first-order dipole approximation and the Fermi golden rule, which is used to obtain the transition rates due to photon emission or absorption. The bound states of the QD are obtained by solving numerically the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian of the QD, while the continuum states are obtained from the retarded Green's function. The in-scattering and out-scattering self-energy functions due to photon interactions are calculated from the total transition rate and the quasi-Fermi level of the QD. The Green's functions of the QDs are obtained by numerically solving their governing kinetic equations using the method of finite differences. A quantum transport equation using the Green's functions is formed to calculate the dark and photocurrent. The model has been applied to simulate the dark current and responsivity of the RT-QDIP at different temperatures and applied biases. The simulated dark current and responsivity with this model are in good agreement with experimental results. The model was used to study the effect on the dark current and the responsivity resulting from changing the QD doping density and the barrier separation between QD layers. The detectivity is obtained for different design parameters. The model used is general and can be used as a tool for the design and prediction of the dark and photocurrent characteristics of different QDIP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it