MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976181916 · doi:10.1186/1742-4690-6-s3-p407

P16-54 LB. Blood CCR6+ Th17 and Th1Th17 but not CCR6neg Th1 cells are targets for HIV replication and their frequency is diminished in HIV-infected subjects

2009· article· en· W1976181916 on OpenAlexaff
Annie Gosselin, Patricia Monteiro, Nicolas Chomont, Felipe Diaz‐Griffero, VS Wacleche, Elias A. Said, Simone Gonçalves Fonseca, Mohamed‐Rachid Boulassel, Jean‐Pierre Routy, R P Sékaly, Petronela Ancuța

Bibliographic record

VenueRetrovirology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow cytometryHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineC-C chemokine receptor type 6ImmunologyAntibodyReplication (statistics)Reverse transcriptaseReal-time polymerase chain reactionVirologyBiologyPolymerase chain reactionGeneInflammationChemokineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistence of HIV in discrete CD4+ T-cell subsets is a barrier toward viral eradication. In an effort to identify primary T-cell subsets that play a critical role in HIV pathogenesis, we investigated the lineage-commitment and susceptibility to HIV infection of CD4+ T-cell subsets identified based on differential expression of the chemokine receptors CCR4, CXCR3, et CCR6. T-cell subsets were sorted from HIV-infected and -uninfected individuals by polychromatic flow cytometry. Expression of lineage-specific transcription factors and cytokines was quantified by real-time RT-PCR and ELISA, respectively. HIV replication and integration were measured by HIV-p24 ELISA and real-time PCR, respectively. The frequency of T-cell subsets was analyzed in HIV-infected and -uninfected individuals. CCR4+CXCR3negCCR6+, CCR4+CXCR3negCCR6neg, CCR4negCXCR3+CCR6+, and CCR4negCXCR3+CCR6neg T-cells expressed cytokines and transcription factors specific for Th17, Th2, Th1Th17, and Th1 lineages, respectively. Th17 and Th1Th17 expressed the HIV co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 and were permissive to R5 and X4 HIV replication. Th2 expressed CXCR4 but not CCR5 and were permissive to X4 HIV only. Th1 expressed CCR5 and CXCR4, but were resistant to R5 and X4 HIV in vitro. Th17 and Th1Th17 but not Th1 cells harbored high levels of integrated HIV-DNA and their frequency was significantly diminished in HIV-infected subjects under anti-retroviral therapy. Th17 and Th1Th17 selectively produced CCL20 and expressed gut- and lymph node-homing molecules. We provide evidence that CCR6+ Th17 and Th1Th17 play a critical role in HIV pathogenesis by an increased permissiveness to HIV infection and ability to infiltrate anatomic sites of viral replication and recruit more CCR6+ T-cells to these sites. We also identified a CCR6neg Th1 subset resistant to HIV infection and depletion in vivo. New therapeutic strategies aimed at HIV eradication should interfere with HIV replication in CCR6+ Th17 and Th1Th17 subsets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRetrovirologySame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207