MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976193394 · doi:10.1159/000239110

Effect of Subinhibitory Concentrations of Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin on the Adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Vero Cells and Voided Uroepithelial Cells

2009· article· en· W1976193394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemotherapy · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiprofloxacinGentamicinVero cellPseudomonas aeruginosaMicrobiologyBiologyPseudomonasAntibacterial agentAntibioticsBacteriaIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of subinhibitory concentrations (1/8 x, 1/16 x, 1/32 x MIC) of ciprofloxacin or gentamicin on the adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Vero cells and voided uroepithelial cells was studied using two different assay methods. Strains studied included both reference strains and clinical strains, including mucoid and nonmucoid isolates. Sub-MICs of ciprofloxacin decreased adherence to Vero cells and voided uroepithelial cells in 3 of 4 ciprofloxacin-susceptible nonmucoid isolates but not in ciprofloxacin-resistant or mucoid isolates. Sub-MICs of gentamicin significantly reduced adherence in 5 of 7 nonmucoid strains but not in mucoid strains. Gentamicin effect on adherence did not correlate with susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. We conclude that ciprofloxacin susceptibility determines the effect of sub-MICs of ciprofloxacin on P. aeruginosa adherence to Vero cells and voided uroepithelial cells. In addition, both the Vero cell assay and voided uroepithelial cell assay demonstrated similar results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it