Determination of the Water Diffusivity of Concrete Using Drying/Absorption Test Results
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Experimental procedures such as ASTM C1585, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes,” and ISO12572 have been recently developed to determine the rate of moisture transmission through hydrated cement systems. However, these methods do not provide an actual transport parameter that can be used in chloride ingress models to predict the service-life of concrete structures. This study focused on the development a reliable method to measure the nonlinear moisture diffusivity of concrete. The approach is based on the analysis of drying and wetting experiments performed with concrete samples of different thicknesses. The transport parameter is obtained by using Richards’ water transport model to analyze the mass variations measured during the tests. The method was tested over a wide range of different concrete mixtures produced with different water/cement ratios. Results indicate that the nonlinear function used to reproduce the mass variation curves must exhibit a strong increase for high water content values. The water diffusivity equation derived from this analysis allows reproducing the behavior of concrete during both the drying and absorption experiments using the same water transport model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it