Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language DisordersArticle1 Jun 2006Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy Phyllis M. Palmer, and Amy T. Neel Phyllis M. Palmer University of New Mexico,Albuquerque Google Scholar More articles by this author and Amy T. Neel University of New Mexico,Albuquerque Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld16.2.17 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Becher, M. W., Morrison, L., Davis, L. E., Maki, W. C., King, M. K., Bicknell, J. M., et al. (2001). Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy in Hispanic New Mexicans.Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 2437–2440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Bouchard, J. P., Brais, B., Brunet, D., Gould, P. V., & Rouleau, G. A. (1997). Recent studies on oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy in Quebec.Neuromuscular Disorders, 7(Suppl. 1), 22–29. Google Scholar Brady, A. P., Stevenson, G. W., Somers, S., Hough, D. M., & Giandomenico, D. E. (1995). Premature contraction of the cricopharyngeus:Anew sign of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Abdominal Imaging, 20, 225–229. Google Scholar Brais, B. (2003). Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy:Alateonsetpolyalanine disease.Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 100, 252–260. Google Scholar Brais, B., Rouleau, G. A., Bouchard, J. P., Fardeau, M., & Tome, F. (1999). Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Seminars in Neurology, 19(1), 59–66. Google Scholar Castell, J. A., Castell, D. O., Duranceau, A., & Topart, P. (1995). Manometric characteristics of the pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter, esophagus, and lower esophageal sphincter in patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Dysphagia, 10, 22–26. Google Scholar de Swart, B .J. M., van der Sluijs, B. M., Vos, A. M. C., Kalf, J. G., Knuijt, S., Cryysberg, J. R. M., et al. (2006). Ptosis aggravates dysphagia in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 77, 266–268. Google Scholar Fradet, G., Pouliot, D., Lavoie, S., & St-Pierre, S. (1988). Inferior constrictor myotomy in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy: Clinical and manometric evaluation.The Journal of Otolaryngology, 17, 68–73. Google Scholar Fradet, G., Pouliot, D., Robichaud, R., St-Pierre, S., & Bouchard, J. (1997). Upper esophageal sphincter myotomy in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy: long-term clinical results.Neuromuscular Disorders, 7(Suppl. 1), 90–95. Google Scholar Hill, M., Hughes, T., &Milford, C. (2004). Treatment for swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) in chronic muscle disease.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD004303. Google Scholar Hughes, T. A. T., & Wiles, C. M. (1996). Clinical measurement of swallowing in health and in neurogenic dysphagia.QJM: Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, 89, 109–116. Google Scholar Kays, S., Robbins, J., Hind, J., Gangnon, R., & Porcaro, E. (2006, March). Effects of lingual exercise on muscle strength and volume related to dose response. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Dysphagia Research Society, Scottsdale, AZ. Google Scholar King, M. K., Lee, R. R., & Davis, L. E. (2005). Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of skeletal muscles in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Journal of Clinical Neuromuscular Disease, 6, 103–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Leaper, M., Zhang, M., & Dawes, P. J. (2005). An anatomical protrusion exists on the posterior hypopharyngeal wall in some elderly cadavers.Dysphagia, 20, 8–14. Google Scholar Leonard, R., Kendall, K., & McKenzie, S. (2004). UES opening and cricopharyngeal bar in nondysphagic elderly and nonelderly adults.Dysphagia, 19, 182–191. Google Scholar Mathieu, J., Lapointe, G., Brassard, A., Tremblay, C., Brais, B., Rouleau, G. A., et al. (1997). A pilot study on upper esophageal sphincter dilatation for the treatment of dysphagia in patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Neuromuscular Disorders, 7, (Suppl. 1), 100–104. Google Scholar McHorney, C. A., Bricker, D. E., Robbins, J., Kramer, A. E., Rosenbek, J. C., & Chignell, K. A. (2000). The SWALQOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults:II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling.Dysphagia, 15, 122–133. Google Scholar McHorney, C. A., Robbins, J., Lomax, K., Rosenbek, J. C., Chignell, K., Kramer, A. E., et al. (2002). The SWALQOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity.Dysphagia, 17, 97–114. Google Scholar Olsen, D. B., Orngreen, M. C., & Vissing, J. (2005). Aerobictraining improves exercise performance in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.Neurology, 64, 1064–1066. Google Scholar Palmer, P. M., Neel, A. T., Sprouls, G., Romero-Clark, C. A., & Morrison, L. (2005, November). Voice, speech and swallowing characteristics in patients with OPMD. Poster presented at the annual ASHA Convention, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar Phillips, B. A., & MastagliaF.L. (2000). Exercise therapy in patients with myopathy.Current Opinion in Neurology, 13, 547–552. Google Scholar Restivo, D. A., Marchese, R. R., Staffieri, A., & de Grandis, D. (2000). Successful botulinum toxin treatment of dysphagia in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Gastroenterology, 119, 1416. Google Scholar Ruegg, S., Hagen, M. L., Hohl, U., Kappos, L., Fuhr, P., Plasilov, M., et al. (2005). Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy—An under-diagnosed disorder?.Swiss Medical Weekly, 135, 574–586. Google Scholar Strasser, G., Schima, W., Schober, E., Pokieser, P., Kaider, A., & Denk, D. M. (2000). Cervical osteophyte impinging on the pharynx: importance of size and concurrent disorders for development of aspiration.American Journal of Radiology, 174, 449–453. Google Scholar Tiomny, E., Khilkevic, O., Korczyn, A. D., Kimmel, R., Hallak, A., Baron, J., et al. (1996). Esophageal smooth muscle dysfunction in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 41, 1350–1354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Tollback, A., Eriksson, S., Wredenberg, A., Jenner, G., Vargas, R., Borg, K., et al. (1999). Effects of high resistance training in patients with myotonic dystrophy.Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine, 31, 9–16. Google Scholar Young, E. C., & Durant-Jones, L. (1997). Gradual onset of dysphagia: A study of patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.Dysphagia, 12, 196–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 16Issue 2June 2006Pages: 17-21 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jun 1, 2006 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2006 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".