Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Flow regimes and particle degradation in pneumatic transport depend on the operating conditions, granular material properties, and dynamic behavior of the system in a very complex way. In this work, an experimental study was carried out using a blow tank system, which was operated under several phase regimes with the help of a secondary air line. Flow maps were constructed to predict horizontal flow patterns under conditions that ranged from plug to dilute phase flow, using two test materials: sodium and potassium nitrate prills. They have identical particle size distributions, but very different strength properties, allowing a comparative study of the particle degradation (breakage and dusting) of soft and hard materials in a wide range of flow conditions, identified as plug-, slug-, dune-, and dilute-phase regimes. The results demonstrated clear advantages in dust reduction for dense-phase conveying compared to dilute phase; however, particle breakage rates were similar in both types of systems. Dusting and breakage were the dominant wear processes for the softer material (sodium nitrate), while breakage, to a lesser extent, prevailed for the case of the brittle material (potassium nitrate). Keywords: AttritionDense phaseDilute phaseParticle wearPneumatic conveying
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it