MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976281484 · doi:10.5589/m04-001

Anticipated applications potential of RADARSAT-2 data

2004· article· en· W1976281484 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
J.J. van der Sanden

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingSynthetic aperture radarGeographyEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractIn this paper we assess how RADARSAT-2's technical enhancements in terms of polarization, spatial resolution, look direction, and orbit control will impact the potential utility of its data products for 32 applications in the fields of agriculture, cartography, disaster management, forestry, geology, hydrology, oceans, and sea and land ice. Our assessment relies on bibliographic sources and, in particular, case studies drawn from ongoing applications development work at the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing and the Canadian Ice Service. The applications potential of RADARSAT-2 data compared with that of RADARSAT-1 data is anticipated to improve in a major, moderate, and minor fashion for 3, 18, and 10 of the identified applications, respectively. For one of the applications considered, the increase in potential of RADARSAT-2 vis-à-vis RADARSAT-1 cannot be assessed because this application relies completely on RADARSAT-2's new full polarimetric capability. Dans cet article, nous évaluons l'impact des améliorations techniques de RADARSAT-2 au plan de la polarisation, de la résolution spatiale, de la direction de visée et du contrôle de l'orbite sur l'utilisation potentielle de ses produits de données pour 32 applications dans les domaines de l'agriculture, de la cartographie, de la gestion des catastrophes, de la foresterie, de la géologie, de l'hydrologie, des océans, de la glace de mer et de la glace continentale. Notre évaluation repose sur des sources bibliographiques et, plus particulièrement, sur des études de cas tirés des travaux de développement des applications en cours au Centre canadien de télédétection et au Service canadien des glaces. Le potentiel d'application des données RADARSAT-2, comparativement à celui des données RADARSAT-1, devrait être amélioré de façon considérable, moyenne ou faible respectivement dans 3, 18 et 10 des applications identifiées. Dans le cas d'une des applications prises en considération, l'accroissement du potentiel de RADARSAT-2 par rapport à RADARSAT-1 ne peut être évalué étant donné que cette application repose entièrement sur les nouvelles données polarimétriques de RADARSAT-2. [Traduit par la Rédaction]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207