A point process approach to assess the frequency dependence of ultrasound backscattering by aggregating red blood cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study the shear-thinning rheological behavior of blood, an acoustical measurement of the erythrocyte aggregation level can be obtained by analyzing the frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscattering from blood. However, the relation that exists among the variables describing the aggregation level and the backscattering coefficient needs to be better clarified. To achieve this purpose, a three-dimensional random model, the Neyman-Scott point process, is proposed to simulate red cell clustering in aggregative conditions at a low hematocrit (H<5%). The frequency dependence of the backscattering coefficient of blood, in non-Rayleigh conditions, is analytically derived from the model, as a function of the size distribution of the aggregates and of their mass fractal dimension. Quantitative predictions of the backscatter increase due to red cell aggregation are given. The parametric model of backscatter enables two descriptive indices of red cell aggregation to be extracted from experimental data, the packing factor W and the size factor delta. Previously published backscatter measurements from porcine whole blood at 4.5% hematocrit, in the frequency range of 3.5 MHz-12.5 MHz, are used to study the shear-rate dependence of these two indices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it