Introducing Design Rigidity to Model Unexpected Disturbances in a DSM-Based Design Process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agile design engineering systems require flexible processes that can adapt rapidly for fast response to dynamic changes in the design requirements due to the market demands and/or internal or external constrains and limitations, without compromising the cost and quality of the design process and design process’ upstream activities, particularly the manufacturing and production processes. These changes in the design requirements can occur as unpredictable events at any time, delaying the convergence of the design process to a feasible solution. In this paper, the flexibility of design process versus an unpredicted event is studied and modeled using the notion of a dynamic index of rigidity for the design process. Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM)-based definition of the sequence and technical relationship of design tasks, a dynamic response to an unexpected change in the design requirements and the additional necessary iterations in the design process are studied and modeled using the dynamic rigidity of the design process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it