Context-Dependent Modulation of Interlimb Cutaneous Reflexes in Arm Muscles as a Function of Stability Threat During Walking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutaneous reflexes evoked in the muscles of the arms with electrical stimulation of nerves of the foot ("interlimb reflexes") are observed during walking. These reflexes have been suggested to coordinate the actions of the legs and arms when walking is disturbed. Recently, we showed that cutaneous reflexes evoked in the leg muscles after stimulation at the foot are modulated according to the level of postural threat during walking. We hypothesized that the amplitude of interlimb cutaneous reflexes would similarly be modulated when subjects walk in unstable environments. Subjects walked on a treadmill under four walking conditions: 1) normal; 2) normal with unpredictable anterior-posterior (AP) perturbations; 3) arms crossed; and 4) arms crossed with unpredictable AP perturbations. Interlimb reflexes evoked from electrical stimulation of the right superficial peroneal or sural nerves were recorded bilaterally, at four points of the step cycle. These reflexes were compared between conditions in which the arms were moving in a similar manner: 1) normal versus AP walking and 2) arms crossed versus arms crossed with AP perturbations. Differences in reflex amplitudes between arms-crossed conditions were observed in most upper limb muscles when subjects were perturbed while walking compared with undisturbed walking. This effect was less apparent when the arms were swinging freely. The results indicate that the strength of interlimb connections is influenced by the level of postural threat (i.e., the context of the behavior), thereby suggesting that these reflexes serve a functional link between the legs and arms during locomotion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".