Occurrence patterns of aspen‐feeding wood‐borers (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) along the wood decay gradient: active selection for specific host types or neutral mechanisms?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract 1. Determinants of host‐use patterns in plant‐feeding insects have been extensively studied, usually within the framework of optimality theory. Comparatively, factors driving host selection in saprophagous insects have received little attention. 2. In this study, mechanisms creating occurrence peaks of saprophagous wood‐borers (Cerambycidae: Coleoptera) in standing dead aspen in the middle and late stages of decay were investigated by correlating insect occurrence with variations in substrate‐related nutritional and physical parameters. Twenty‐four snags at four decay stages were dissected from a mature stand in western Quebec, Canada. Wood samples were taken to measure levels of nitrogen, non‐structural carbohydrates, phenols, wood density, water content and snag age. 3. Several nutritional and physical parameters varied significantly along the decay gradient and were correlated with insect occurrence, but all significant parameters were also strongly correlated with snag age and wood density. Model selection using Akaike’s second order information criteria was used to rank the different models; the model including snag age only performed best, with a w i of 0.873. 4. This importance of snag age gives support to a proposed hypothesis of host selection in which temporal autocorrelation in probability of insect occurrence explains peaks observed in the middle and late stages of decay. However, further studies will be needed to confirm the prevalence of such neutral mechanisms over active selection in the determination of host‐use patterns in decaying aspen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".