MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976515837 · doi:10.1063/1.3556786

Spin dynamics and magnetic anisotropies at the Fe/GaAs(001) interface

2011· article· en· W1976515837 on OpenAlexaff
B. Kardasz, Eric Montoya, C. Eyrich, Erol Girt, B. Heinrich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsFerromagnetic resonanceAnisotropyMaterials scienceMolecular beam epitaxyMagnonMagnetic anisotropyCurie temperatureScatteringLaser linewidthPerpendicularFerromagnetismEpitaxyPhysicsMagnetic fieldMagnetizationOpticsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

20Au/(d)Fe/GaAs(001) structures were deposited using molecular beam epitaxy, where Fe thickness d = (5...90) atomic layers. Interface anisotropies were investigated using the in-plane angular dependence of ferromagnetic resonance (FMR). Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to magnetic damping were investigated using FMR linewidth (ΔH) measurements at 9, 24, 36, and 72 GHz (in-plane configuration) and 9, 24, and 36 GHz (perpendicular configuration). The in-plane cubic and uniaxial perpendicular anisotropies were well described by the bulk and interface contributions indicating that the Fe films have a high lattice coherence and high critical Curie temperature Tc. The in-plane uniaxial anisotropy is more complex and will be discussed in detail. The frequency dependence of ΔH(f) was analyzed using the Gilbert damping, two magnon scattering, and long range magnetic inhomogeneity contributions. The thickness dependence of the Gilbert damping parameter α was found to be well described by the bulk and interface terms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207