MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976543664 · doi:10.1139/g04-037

The prevalence and evolution of sex in microorganisms

2004· review· en· W1976543664 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jianping Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEvolution of sexual reproductionSexual reproductionEvolutionary biologyExperimental evolutionEcologyWolbachiaGeneticsZoologyHost (biology)Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The origin of sex and how sex is maintained are among the biggest puzzles in biology. Most investigations into this problem have focused on complex eukaryotes like animals and plants. This mini-review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of the evolution of sex, highlighting results from studies of experimental and natural populations of microorganisms. Increasing evidence indicates that sexual reproduction in natural populations of viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotic microbes is much more prevalent than previously thought. In addition, investigations using experimental microbial populations are providing important parameters relevant to our understanding of the origin and maintenance of sex. It is argued that microbes are excellent model organisms to explore the mechanisms responsible for the evolution of sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207