← all works
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Topic
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- St. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
- Funders
- Health Technology Assessment ProgrammeNational Institutes of HealthResearch Councils UKMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMcGill University
- Keywords
- MedicinePsychological interventionQuality (philosophy)Clinical trialClinical equipoiseMEDLINEProspective cohort studySurgeryNursing
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no