MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<sup>30</sup>P(<i>p</i>,γ)<sup>31</sup>S Reaction Rate for Classical Novae: An Indirect Approach

2012· article· en· W1976658941 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomical and nuclear sciences
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova (rocket)NucleosynthesisEjectaPresolar grainsNeonPhysicsAbundance (ecology)ProtonReaction rateAstrophysicsNuclear physicsNuclear reactionAtomic physicsChemistrySupernova

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isotopic abundance ratios of 30Si/28Si found in presolar SiC grains of suspected nova origin agree qualitatively with proposed oxygen-neon (ONe) nova composition but fail to agree quantitatively with ejecta predictions made by hydrodynamic ONe nova models. The Astrophysical 30P(p,γ)31S reaction rate is a key quantity used in nova models that predict isotopic abundances produced during nucleosynthesis leading up to the outburst. Currently, there is a large uncertainty in the rate at nova temperatures (0.1 < T < 0.4 GK) causing the predicted 30Si abundance ratio to vary by a factor of 4. The 30P(p,γ)31S reaction rate can be determined indirectly by measuring triton momenta from 32S(d,t)31S reactions. 31S Resonant states measured up to 600 keV above the proton threshold of 6131 keV and within the Gamow window which contribute most significantly to the rate can then be used to re-evaluate the rate for nova temperatures and reduce the uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it