Molecular architecture and rates of DNA substitutions of the mitochondrial control region of cracid birds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The control region (CR) plays an important role in replication and transcription in the mitochondrial genome. Its supposedly high rate of DNA substitution makes it a suitable marker for studies of population and closely related species. Three domains can be identified in CR, each having its own characteristics regarding base composition, pattern of variability and rate of DNA substitution. We sequenced the complete CR for 27 cracids, including all 11 genera to characterize its molecular organization, describe patterns of DNA substitution along the gene, and estimate absolute rates of DNA substitution. Our results show that cracid CR organization and patterns of DNA substitution are typical of other birds. Conserved blocks C and B, fused CSB2/3, and a putative segment for bidirectional replication not usually present in birds were identified in cracids. We also suggest a new delimitation for domains to allow better comparisons among CRs at different taxonomic ranking. Our estimates of absolute rates of DNA substitution show that, in general, CR evolves at a rate slower than that of two protein-coding genes (CR, 0.14%-0.3%; ND2, 0.37%-0.47%; and cytochrome b, 0.29%-0.35% per site per million years within genera). Within CR domains, rates within genera ranged from 0.05% to 0.8% per site per million years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".