Perindopril attenuates tubular hypoxia and inflammation in an experimental model of diabetic nephropathy in transgenic <i>Ren‐2</i> rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal hypoxia plays a role in the development of diabetic nephropathy, and may be mediated by overactivity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). In this study the localization of cellular hypoxia in an experimental model of diabetic nephropathy was assessed, and the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on hypoxia evaluated. METHODS: Female Sprague-Dawley rats heterozygous for the Ren-2 gene were randomized to three groups (n = 8 per group)--controls, diabetes or diabetes + perindopril. Diabetes was induced by injection of streptozotocin at 6 weeks of age. Perindopril was administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg daily from 6 weeks. Subjects were culled after 16 weeks. Areas of tissue hypoxia were localized using immunohistochemistry to detect pimonidazole uptake. RESULTS: Diabetic rat kidneys were characterized by increases in tubulointerstitial collagen deposition compared with controls. Tubular hypoxia was significantly greater in diabetic rats, indicated by a 2.5-fold increase in the proportional area of pimonidazole immunostaining (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical staining for pimonidazole co-localized with osteopontin, and was associated with higher numbers of ED-1-positive cells (macrophages) within the tubulointerstitium. Treatment with perindopril ameliorated structural changes of diabetic nephropathy and reduced the amount of pimonidazole and ED-1 immunostaining to levels similar to that of controls. CONCLUSION: In diabetic Ren-2 rats the development of diabetic nephropathy was associated with tubular hypoxia. Co-localization of osteopontin with hypoxic cells suggests that tubular hypoxia may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. The degree of hypoxia and fibrosis was attenuated by treatment with perindopril.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".