The Effects of Hot Isostatic Pressing Conditions on the Microstructure of Beta-Gamma Titanium Aluminide Powder Alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of hot isostatic pressing temperature and cooling rate on the microstructure of two powder metallurgy beta-gamma titanium aluminide alloys with nominal compositions TiAl 4Nb 3Mn (G1) and TiAl-2Nb-2Mo (G2) are investigated. Particular attention is placed on the volume fraction of the beta phase, which is known to improve the hot workability. The alloys are consolidated by hot isostatic pressing at 1200 °C, 1250 °C, and 1300 °C, and cooled at rates between 3.0 °C/min and 17.5 °C/min. The volume fraction of beta phase in both alloys was unaffected by the change in cooling rates. The volume fraction of the beta phase in G2 decreased linearly from ~9.5 vol.% to ~3.5 vol.% with increasing HIP temperature from 1200 °C to 1300 °C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".