Effects of Isokinetic Strength Training on Concentric and Eccentric Torque Development in the Ankle Dorsiflexors of Older Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study quantifies concentric and eccentric dorsiflexor muscle torque at various movement velocities and determines the neuromuscular effects from short-term practice of repeated maximal voluntary contractions using an isokinetic resisted exercise program in older adults. Twenty-eight subjects (76.3+/-4.6 years) trained concentric and eccentric dorsiflexion 3 days per week for 2 weeks at 30 degrees, 90 degrees, and 180 degrees/s through 40 degrees of dorsiflexion range of motion. Peak torque, rate of torque development, surface electromyography, and strength curves at each velocity were compared before and after training. Increases were found for concentric (27%) and eccentric (20%) dorsiflexor peak torque and concentric rate of torque production (20%-53%) across all movement velocities (p < .01). Training also significantly increased dorsiflexor concentric (64%) and eccentric (55%) surface electromyography; taken together, this is evidence of apparent adaptation of neural factors in older adults with short-term training. These findings support that eccentric and concentric strength training enhances the control and production of ankle muscle dorsiflexor torque in older adults, with implications for improving functional mobility of the ankle joint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".