Conservative Neurosurgical Management of Intracranial Epidural Abscesses in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Traditional management of epidural abscesses caused by sinusitis in children involves neurosurgical drainage. With better techniques to drain affected sinuses, to identify causative organisms, and to guide medical therapy, some pediatric epidural intracranial abscesses may be treated effectively with sinus drainage and antibiotics, without an intracranial procedure. METHODS: Charts and computed tomographic scans of children with isolated intracranial epidural abscess associated with sinusitis who were treated in a pediatric hospital were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Eight patients were treated between 1982 and 2002. All patients received antibiotic therapy appropriate to the causative organism(s). Four patients treated before mid-1997 had an intracranial procedure additionally (operative group, Group 1), and four patients treated thereafter did not (conservative group, Group 2). Abscesses had a mean size of 3 x 3 x 1 cm (length x width x depth) in both groups. All patients experienced clinical and radiographic resolution of the infection with treatment. In Group 1, neurosurgical management consisted of burr hole drainage in two patients and craniotomy in two patients. Extranasal otorhinolaryngological procedures for sinus drainage were performed in two patients. In Group 2, endonasal procedures were used in three patients for paranasal sinus infections to effect drainage and obtain specimens for culture. A radical mastoidectomy was required in the single patient with mastoiditis. Although two of four patients initially demonstrated transient worsening of headaches, all patients subsequently improved rapidly after the first week of treatment. Computed tomographic follow-up revealed minimal or no enlargement of the abscess or mass effect at 1 week, decrease or stable size at 2 weeks, and resolution by 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Sinus-related intracranial epidural abscesses in children may be managed without neurosurgical procedures in the setting of adequate sinus drainage, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and minimal extradural mass effect from the abscess. Symptomatic worsening without significant increase in mass effect during the first week of therapy is not necessarily an indication for an intracranial drainage procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".