Influence of Secondary Components on the Synthesis of Self-Cross-Linked <i>N</i>-Isopropylacrylamide Microgels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents systematic studies of cross-linker-free microgels formed by copolymerization of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) and various secondary monomer components in water under standard reaction conditions. The sizes, solid densities, and volume phase transitions of these particles have been characterized through static and dynamic laser light-scattering experiments. We find that introducing a hydrophobic component, for example, styrene (St) or methyl methacrylate (MMA), leads to particles with smaller sizes and higher solid densities, while the volume phase transition shifts to lower temperatures. On the other hand, introducing a hydrophilic component such as acrylamide (AAm) or acrylic acid (AA) leads to larger particles with lower solid densities and a volume phase transition that shifts to higher temperatures and is broadened. The molar mass changes little in either case. Introducing a charged component such as sodium styrene sulfonate (NaSS) or poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) (PNaSS) leads to a sharp decrease in molar mass and particle size, and a very broad phase transition. These trends provide good guidance for synthesizing both self-cross-linked and cross-linked copolymerized microgels of different properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".