Assessing the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in children: An in vitro study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Age-related changes in the hemostatic system result in variation in response to anticoagulants and coagulation assays over childhood. This study used in vitro methods to determine i) optimum coagulation assays for dabigatran in children and ii) anticoagulant effect of dabigatran across pediatric age groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled plasma samples from healthy children aged 0 to <1, 1 to <5, 5 to <10, 10 to <17 years and adults were spiked with increasing concentrations of dabigatran and the effect was assessed in five coagulation assays. The samples were also assessed for overall hemostasis potential using a fibrin clot formation and lysis assay. RESULTS: In all five coagulation assays, there were no differences in responses to dabigatran over all pediatric age groups. The international normalized ratio was the least sensitive measure. Activated partial thromboplastin time showed moderate sensitivity and a nonlinear response curve. Thrombin time (TT), dilute TT (dTT) and ecarin clotting time were linearly correlated with dabigatran concentrations; however, the ecarin time and TT were overly sensitive. In the overall hemostasis potential assay, increasing dabigatran concentrations delayed the initiation of clot formation and reduced the time to 50% clot lysis. The responses to initiation of clot formation and clot lysis were consistent across all pediatric groups and comparable to responses in adults. CONCLUSION: The dTT is the most suitable assay for measuring dabigatran concentrations in children. Fibrin clot generation and lysis assay responses to dabigatran in children over all ages were consistent and comparable to those of adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".