MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977071236 · doi:10.2118/07-04-06

Influence of In-Situ Fuel Deposition on Air Injection and Combustion Processes

2007· article· en· W1977071236 on OpenAlexafffund
G.D. Adagulu, I. Yücel Akkutlu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombustionWork (physics)MechanicsReaction ratePorous mediumSecondary air injectionChemical reactionPorosityChemistryMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysicsCatalysisComposite materialPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sustained propagation of a combustion front is necessary for improved oil recovery during an air injection and in situ combustion process. The front is a sharp diffusive layer and involves the added complexities of reactions. In this work, the combustion front is represented by two oxidation reactions: a high-temperature fuel burning reaction and a low-temperature fuel generating reaction. Due to distinct reaction kinetics and stoichiometry, the reactions occur in sequential regions within a finite separation distance in the reservoir. Interaction of these regions and its overall influence on the front propagation are investigated locally using an analytical approach based on large activation energies of the reactions. Reservoir conditions under which the regions could travel with a common propagation speed is identified and their limits of coherence are investigated in the presence of external heat losses. Consequently, a new intricate relationship between the reservoir heat loss rate and separation distance of the reaction regions is found and formulated. The regions propagate closely spaced, thus minimizing the influence of deleterious heat losses and improving the combustion process performance. This two-reaction self-sustainability mechanism keeps the combustion front propagating steadily, even though under the same conditions front extinction has been predicted for the equivalent single-reaction problem. The work emphasizes the importance of local nonlinear chemical processes during air injection. Introduction Propagation of combustion fronts in porous media has been studied extensively in the filtration combustion literature. It is a subject of interest to a variety of applications, ranging from in-situ combustion for the recovery of heavy and light oils to catalyst regeneration, coal gasification, smoldering, waste incineration, ore calcinations or the high-temperature synthesis of powdered materials(1). The fuel may pre-exist as part of the solid matrix or, as in the case of in-situ combustion, it may be created by local processes such as pyrolysis and low-temperature oxidation reactions. Dynamics of filtration combustion is influenced by the flow of injected and produced gases, the heat and mass transfer in the porous medium and the rates of reactions. An analytical treatment can be accomplished assuming a sharp exothermic oxidation front using large activation energy asymptotics; a technique widely considered to investigate laminar flames in the absence of a porous material(2,3). Akkutlu and Yortsos(4,5) considered the application of the technique for modeling dry forward in situ combustion fronts in porous media. They investigated the effects of reservoir heat losses(4) and the impact of reservoir heterogeneity(5) on ignition, sustained front propagation and extinction. Their investigations were based on a main (high-temperature) oxidation reaction only, however. In this paper, the presence of an additional oxidation reaction occurring at lower temperatures is considered. The latter precedes the main combustion region, takes place at lower temperatures and generates the fuel necessary for sustained propagation of the former. Under certain conditions, the two reaction regions are thermally coupled, in which case they may propagate coherently, albeit at a finite distance from each other. Otherwise, they become uncoupled, with the region of low-temperature oxidation traveling far ahead at higher velocities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207