MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977109589 · doi:10.1101/pdb.prot080325

LysoTracker Staining to Aid in Monitoring Autophagy in <i>Drosophila</i>

2014· article· en· W1977109589 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Protocols · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityBC Cancer Agency
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAutophagyCell biologyStainingBiologyFlow cytometryCellMolecular biologyGeneticsApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LysoTracker is an acidotropic dye that stains cellular acidic compartments, including lysosomes and autolysosomes. LysoTracker has been used to detect autophagy-associated lysosomal activity in Drosophila tissues including the fat body, midgut, salivary gland and ovary, as well as in Drosophila cell culture. A low level of LysoTracker staining can be observed under resting or well-fed conditions, and is increased following autophagic stimuli such as starvation. Here we provide a protocol for examining LysoTracker levels in Drosophila cultured cells in vitro using standard cell culture methods and flow cytometry. We also describe how to examine LysoTracker in fixed and nonfixed Drosophila tissues using fluorescence microscopy. Ovary tissue is used as an example. Dissections of ovaries are relatively easy to perform, given their large size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it