Identification and Quantification of Differentially Expressed Proteins in E-Cadherin Deficient SCC9 Cells and SCC9 Transfectants Expressing E-Cadherin by Dimethyl Isotope Labeling, LC−MALDI MS and MS/MS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A strategy based on isotope labeling of peptides and liquid chromatography matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LC-MALDI MS) has been employed to accurately quantify and confidently identify differentially expressed proteins between an E-cadherin-deficient human carcinoma cell line (SCC9) and its transfectants expressing E-cadherin (SCC9-E). Proteins extracted from each cell line were tryptically digested and the resultant peptides were labeled individually with either d(0)- or d(2)-formaldehyde. The labeled peptides were combined and the peptide mixture was separated and fractionated by a strong cation exchange (SCX) column. Peptides from each SCX fraction were further separated by a microbore reversed-phase (RP) LC column. The effluents were then directly spotted onto a MALDI target using a heated droplet LC-MALDI interface. After mixing with a MALDI matrix, individual sample spots were analyzed by MALDI quadrupole time-of-flight MS, using an initial MS scan to quantify the dimethyl labeled peptide pairs. MS/MS analysis was then carried out on the peptide pairs having relative peak intensity changes of greater than 2-fold. The MS/MS spectra were subjected to database searching for protein identification. The search results were further confirmed by comparing the MS/MS spectra of the peptide pairs. Using this strategy, we detected and compared relative peak intensity changes of 5480 peptide pairs. Among them, 320 peptide pairs showed changes of greater than 2-fold. MS/MS analysis of these changing pairs led to the identification of 49 differentially expressed proteins between the parental SCC9 cells and SCC9-E transfectants. These proteins were determined to be involved in different pathways regulating cytoskeletal organization, cell adhesion, epithelial polarity, and cell proliferation. The changes in protein expression were consistent with increased cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion and decreased proliferation in SCC9-E cells, in line with E-cadherin tumor suppressor activity. Finally, the accuracy of the MS quantification and subcellular localization for 6 differentially expressed proteins were validated by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence assays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".