MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977154962 · doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.793408

Validation of the Episodic Disability Framework with adults living with HIV

2013· article· en· W1977154962 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kelly K. O’Brien, Steven Hanna, Sandra Gardner, Ahmed M. Bayoumi, Sergio Rueda, Trevor Hart, Curtis Cooper, Patricia Solomon, Sean B. Rourke, Aileen M. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability and Rehabilitation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV-related health complications and treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaInstitute of Health Services and Policy ResearchSt. Michael's HospitalOntario HIV Treatment NetworkMcMaster UniversityUniversity Health NetworkToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario HIV Treatment Network
KeywordsObservational studyPsychologyConfirmatory factor analysisCohortGoodness of fitGerontologyCohort studyLatent variablePhysical disabilityClinical psychologyStructural equation modelingMedicinePsychiatryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess the validity of dimensions of disability in the Episodic Disability Framework, a conceptual framework derived from the perspective of adults living with HIV. METHODS: We conducted confirmatory factor analyses with 913 adults living with HIV in an observational cohort study called the Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study (OCS). We tested hypotheses that dimensions of disability in the Episodic Disability Framework were represented by a group of measured variables in the observational database. RESULTS: A model comprised of four latent variables and 43 indicator variables with one cross-loading was superior to models with fewer latent variables and more indicator variables and supported the validity of disability dimensions: physical health symptoms (represented by 21 indicator variables), mental health symptoms (10 variables), difficulties with day-to-day activities (5 variables) and challenges to social inclusion (8 variables). Overall goodness of fit statistics were χ(2 )= 2621.50 (p < 0.001), Comparative Fit Index = 0.912, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.907 and root mean square error of approximation = 0.048. Dimensions of disability correlated with each other ranging from r = 0.44 (between physical symptoms and challenges to social inclusion) to r = 0.81 (between physical symptoms and difficulties with day-to-day activities). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the validity of four disability dimensions in the Episodic Disability Framework. This framework provides a new way to conceptualize disability and can lay the foundation for developing a future HIV disability measure for clinical and health services research. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The Episodic Disability Framework is the first known conceptual framework of disability developed from the perspective of adults living with HIV. Results from this confirmatory factor analysis support the validity of four dimensions of disability experienced by adults living with HIV in the Episodic Disability Framework including: physical symptoms and impairments, mental health symptoms and impairments, difficulties carrying out day-to-day activities, and challenges to social inclusion. The Episodic Disability Framework provides a new way to conceptualize disability experienced by adults living with HIV. Clinicians can use this Framework to better understand episodic disability experienced by adults living with HIV. Clinicians can frame their assessments of disability to include physical and mental health symptoms and impairments as well as consider a patient's ability to participate in society, and indicate areas to apply interventions or strategies to prevent or mitigate disability experienced by adults living with HIV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisability and RehabilitationSame topicHIV-related health complications and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207